Piyush Mahajan, LL.M, Christ (Deemed to be University), Bangalore
ABSTRACT
The schools of thought typically believe that the law is a cohesive and comprehensive set of rules, and that the judicial process is an important logical application of existing legal principles. Later, the sociologic school of jurisprudence evolved as a right wing for studying law with a social focus. It equated the job of law to that of an architect and a lawyer to that of an engineer. The function of law is to satisfy the greatest number of desires with the least amount of friction. Realists dominate the left wing. They describe law as a set of judgments rather than a set of rules. The involvement of the judge is vital in this method. In the contemporary state, the law is usually produced by official act legislation or a judicial judgement. We investigate the function of the judge in the judicial process. The researcher in this paper intends to do a comparative study of Judicial Process of France, Germany and United States.
Keywords: Judicial Process, Jurisprudence, Comparative Study, legislation, Schools of Thought.
