A Prognosis Of The Death Penalty

Rukhsaar Dhaliwal & Vanshika Tuteja, University Institute of Legal Studies, Chandigarh Panjab University


The death penalty in India has gone through various phases of development. From existing as a strict law to being an exception in the court of law, the concept has evolved drastically albeit being open to several interpretations. The capital punishment like several other criminal concepts has been inherited from the British rule and the Courts of India have passed several judgments which have defined and refined the theory capital punishment.

This paper gives a brief introduction of the concept of the death sentence and its constitutional validity. It substantiates as to how the law has evolved over the years. It transverses the process of evolution of the law on the issue based in various cases and judgments passed by the courts in India where the accused was either executed or his sentence was commuted into imprisonment for life.

The paper also highlights the technicalities and the loopholes of the penalty, such as when the sentence awarded is mitigated, because of the plethora of loopholes available to the criminals.

Keywords: Death Penalty; Rarest of the Rare; Judicial process; Rape murders; Limitation period.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo


​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.