top of page

Abolition Of Constructive Murder Rule




Nyuol Justin Y. Arop, Esq., BA(Winnipeg), MILIR (UNSW), JD (Sydney), Chairperson, South Sudan Human Rights Commission


ABSTRACT:


This paper argues for the abolition of constructive murder rule as conceptualized in the Australian jurisdiction. The paper exposes the idiosyncrasy inherent to the rule of constructive murder as pertaining homicide. And because the formulation of the rule relies on transferring the element of intent for the commission or omission of a foundational offence to the act of killing so as to find culpability for the homicide, this paper argues that such construction of murder obliterates a fundamental pillar of criminal law: the concurrence of a criminal act with a criminal mind. The variance in the formulation of murder as provided for by statute and its formulation within the common law doctrine of ‘constructive murder’ confuses practitioners and operates unjustly to those individuals accused and exposed to the wrath of the rule of constructive murder. This paper, therefore, asserts that prudence dictates the rule be abandoned for the circumstance that led to its creation, in the first place, have long ceased to exist.


Keywords: murder, mens rea, felon(y), homicide



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page