Administrative Law: Rule-Making V. Adjudication
- IJLLR Journal
- Aug 8
- 1 min read
Ishant Warde, Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur
ABSTRACT
Administrative law-making encompasses two primary mechanisms: rulemaking and adjudication. Rulemaking is the process by which administrative agencies create general regulations or guidelines that have the force of law, impacting large groups of people by establishing broad policies. Conversely, adjudication involves resolving specific disputes or issues on a case-by-case basis, applying existing rules to particular situations and often resulting in individual or situational outcomes. The choice between rulemaking and adjudication reflects an agency’s approach to balancing efficiency, fairness, and accountability. While rulemaking offers clarity and predictability, adjudication provides flexibility and adaptability to unique circumstances. This paper explores the principles, processes, and implications of rulemaking and adjudication within administrative law, highlighting their roles in achieving justice and effectiveness in governance. Analysing their advantages, limitations, and the circumstances under which each method is applied, this study sheds light on how agencies navigate the complex requirements of law and public interest through these two modes of action.
Keywords: Adjudication, Administrative Law, Natural Justice, Rulemaking.
