An Analytical Study Of The Christian Marriage Act
- IJLLR Journal
- Aug 22, 2024
- 2 min read
Chitresh Joshi, Symbiosis Law School, Noida
Introduction –
In India, a land of diverse religions, each faith has historically been governed by its own customs and religious practices. Prior to the colonial period and the enactment of statutory laws, most religions in India were guided by a tapestry of customary laws, religious traditions, and cultural norms. However, this was not the case for Indian Christians from the very beginning. The unique situation of Indian Christians, who were primarily converts from Hinduism and Islam rather than original Christians from Britain or other Western countries, created a complex legal and cultural landscape. These converts found themselves grappling between Western culture and their original traditions while trying to follow Christianity in India. This hybrid identity posed challenges in applying existing legal frameworks. Recognizing the need for a standardized legal structure for Christian marriages in India, the British colonial government enacted the Christian Marriage Act of 1872 (Agnes, 2011). This legislation aimed to provide a unified framework for the diverse practices of various Christian sects, ensuring that marriages were properly solemnized with due legal recognition. The Act was particularly significant as it addressed the unique needs of Indian Christians, differentiating them from both their previous religious laws and British personal laws. Unlike the canon law that influenced Western Christianity, the Christian Marriage Act of 1872 was primarily based on civil law. It demanded the governance of marriages according to codified laws and proper legal formalities, though some elements of canon law and Indian Christian culture were incorporated. The Act stipulated certain prerequisites and procedural requirements for a valid marriage, including who could solemnize the marriage and the qualifications required. The enactment of this Act was crucial during the colonial period, as it provided Indian Christians with their own legal identity. It ensured that they were not judged by their previous religious laws while also recognizing that British personal laws could not be directly applied to them. This was in line with the British policy of non-interference with religious laws and practices, which had initially created a legal limbo for Indian Christians.

