top of page

Analysis On The Topic Exclusion Of Lawyers From Court And Tribunal Of Advocates Act

Analysis On The Topic Exclusion Of Lawyers From Court And Tribunal Of Advocates Act, And Can A Chartered Accountant Represent In Tribunal On Behalf Of Lawyer




S.E. SIVAM, Vellore Institute of Technology

INTRODUCTION:-

The exclusion of lawyers from tribunals is a contentious issue that has generated much debate and controversy in the legal community. Tribunals are administrative bodies that are established by governments to make decisions on disputes in a particular area of law. They are often used as an alternative to traditional courts as they provide a quicker and more informal way of resolving disputes. 1The exclusion of lawyers from tribunals can be seen as both a positive and negative development, depending on the context in which it occurs. On the one hand, it can be argued that the exclusion of lawyers can lead to greater access to justice for those who cannot afford legal representation. This is because tribunals are often less formal than traditional courts and can be more welcoming to non-lawyers. Furthermore, the exclusion of lawyers can also result in a more level playing field between parties, as neither side will have a lawyer to represent them.

On the other hand, the exclusion of lawyers can also be seen as a negative development. Lawyers are trained to represent clients and navigate complex legal issues, and their absence from tribunals can result in a lack of expertise and legal knowledge in the decision-making process. This can lead to unfair decisions and a lack of transparency in the tribunal process. Furthermore, the absence of lawyers can also result in a lack of accountability and oversight, as there may be no legal professionals to challenge or question the decisions made by the tribunal. There are several different reasons why lawyers may be excluded from tribunals. One reason is cost.

Lawyers can be expensive, and some tribunals are designed to be a more affordable alternative to traditional courts. Another reason is accessibility. Some individuals may feel intimidated or uncomfortable in the presence of lawyers, and the exclusion of lawyers can make the tribunal process feel less formal and more approachable. Additionally, the exclusion of lawyers can also be a deliberate decision by governments or policymakers who feel that the legal system is too complex and bureaucratic, and that simpler, more straightforward decision-making is needed.

Exclusion of lawyers from court is a legal term that refers to the act of preventing a lawyer from participating in a particular court proceeding. There are several reasons why a lawyer may be excluded from a court proceeding, including ethical violations, disruptive behavior, or conflicts of interest. In this article, we will discuss the different circumstances in which lawyers may be excluded from court, the reasons behind the exclusions, and the impact that it can have on the legal system. One of the most common reasons why a lawyer may be excluded from court is for unethical behavior. The legal profession has a set of rules and regulations that govern the conduct of lawyers, known as the Rules of Professional Conduct. These rules set out standards of behavior that lawyers are expected to follow, such as maintaining client confidentiality and avoiding conflicts of interest. If a lawyer is found to have violated these rules, they may face disciplinary action, including exclusion from court.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page