top of page

Case Analysis: Chahat Khan V. State Of Haryana




Rakshita Mathur, DME Law School, GGSIPU

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we shall analyse the case of Chahat Khan v. State of Haryana (AIR 1972 SC 2574). Herein, various rules were set with regard to offences set in the Indian Penal Code – culpable homicide (s. 299), murder (s. 300) and grievous hurt (s. 322).

Within this paper, we will discuss the facts of the case, followed by the legal issues as well as the ratio decidendi. Furthermore, I have also analyzed the case from my perspective, with a final conclusion containing my understanding of this case. My analysis of this case has helped me in understanding the relationship between culpable homicide, murder and grievous hurt within the Indian Penal Code and their implementation in the legal system of India.

The case has been crucial when it comes to discussing mens rea, i.e. intention of the accused while the crime was being committed and the motive behind this intention. Mens rea, directly translates to ‘mental element’. Therefore, this case has held significant importance with regard to the idea and intention behind the crime.

Keywords: Murder; Homicide; Grievous Hurt; Mens Rea; Actus Reus.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page