top of page

Case Comment: In Re: Alleged Anti-Competitive Conduct By Maruti Suzuki India Limited In Implementing Discount Control Policy Vis-À-Vis Dealers


 


Anuraj Upadhya, LLM (Corporate and Commercial Law), MIT-WPU (Pune), Faculty of Law


ABSTRACT


This case commentary examines a recent Competition Commission of India (CCI) case that delves into distinguishing downstream and upstream markets in the context of vertical agreements. The author underscores the broad interpretation of agreements under the Competition Act 2002 and the use of email evidence to establish anti-competitive behaviour by a manufacturer towards its dealers. The comment also discusses the implications of Resale Price Maintenance on consumers, distributors, and competitors. Additionally, it addresses the concept of Mens Rea in competition cases, emphasizing the importance of analyzing the actual impact on competition rather than intent. The conclusion applauds the CCI's thorough analysis and reliance on email evidence while cautioning against potential misuse and manipulation. The comment emphasizes the need for standardized criteria for admitting email evidence to uphold the integrity of competition law enforcement process.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

​

Abbreviation: IJLLR

​

ISSN: 2582-8878

​

Website: www.ijllr.com

​

Accessibility: Open Access

​

License: Creative Commons 4.0

​

Submit Manuscript: Click here

​

Licensing: ​

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

​

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page