top of page

Clash Between Morality And Law In Same-Sex Marriages




Sara Kiran Mathew, Christ (Deemed to be University), Bangalore

ABSTRACT

This legal essay is a critical study concerning the clash between morality and law when it comes to same sex marriages. In this paper, the author seeks to establish that same sex marriages should be legalised since it is legally valid. But here a clash between law and morality can be observed, as the reason for it not being legalised is the “social set of standards which defines good behaviour”, that is, the concept referred to as ‘social morality’. In a heteronormative society such as India’s, same sex relationships are viewed to be immoral by a significant portion of the general public. Thus, despite the principles of equality, freedom and privacy, ideals upheld by the Indian law, same sex marriages are not legalised which portrays a clear violation of these rights. This clash will further be examined through the analysis of Navtej Singh Johar vs Union of India1 and Abhijit Iyer Mitra and Ors. Vs. Union of India, along with other important landmark cases in this regard.

Keywords: Law and Morality, Same-sex marriages, LGBTQ+ community, homophobia, religious beliefs.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page