top of page

Data Protection Rights In The Age Of AI: Navigating The Privacy Dilemma And Conflicts




Dr. Amitesh Anand & Dr. Ashutesh Anand


ABSTRACT


Today, the rapid expansion and continual evolution of Artificial Intelligence are converging with an unprecedented surge in personal privacy litigation. In India the landmark judgment of Justice Puttaswamy not only reshaped the constitutional interpretation of the right to privacy but also redefined the foundational relationship between the individual and the state. This study undertakes a comprehensive doctrinal analysis, comparative constitutional review, and an assessment to measure the real status of available regulations which aims to govern AI. The increasing deployment of AI systems across vital social infrastructures highlights the serious consequences that arise when innovation is pursued without adequate consideration for protecting individual privacy rights and maintaining the legitimacy of democratic governance. This paper worked as a tool that suggests a 'constitutional technology assessment' methodology, which evaluates AI systems against fundamental rights standards.


Keywords: AI, Right to privacy, Supreme Court, Constitution, Puttaswamy Judgment



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page