Deciphering A Rape Verdict Through The Pretense Of Stereotypes

Sundus Karim, B.Com. LLB., O.P. Jindal Global University

ABSTRACT

This article examines how commonplace caste and sexism are in Indian courts, with a focus on rape cases. Case studies like as the Mathura and Bhanwari Devi instances reveal the judiciary's inability to confront prejudices, hence sustaining discriminatory practices against the Adivasi, Dalit, and Bahujan populations. It is emphasized that the lack of gender sensitization in legal education reflects the judiciary's insensitivity to women, particularly those from marginalized communities. Stereotypes, victim-blaming, and faulty reasoning all play a part in rape verdicts, as seen by the Mathura case. According to the paper, personal prejudices and cultural beliefs about rape and consent obstruct the legal system for survivors, perpetuating patriarchal standards and gender inequalities.