top of page

Digital Surveillance Vs. Privacy Rights: Constitutional Limits Post-Puttaswamy




Manish Kumar, Research Scholar, School of Law, Bennett University, Greater Noida


ABSTRACT


The landmark judgement of Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) v Union of India (2017) by the honourable Supreme Court of India has revamped the constitutional jurisprudence in the country by elevating the right to privacy to a fundamental right guaranteed under Part III of the Indian Constitution. However, the rapid growth of digital surveillance, strengthen by the Information Technology Act 2000 and the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act 2023, has created a conflict between state security and individual autonomy. The present paper seeks to examine the "proportionality test" as the definitive constitutional limit on state surveillance, arguing that while the legal framework exists, executive exemptions and a lack of judicial oversight continue to threaten the "privacy of the soul."


Keywords: Right to Privacy, Proportionality test, DPDP Act 2023, IT Act 2000.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page