Sonika Bisht, BBA LLB(H), Law College Dehradun, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
Prof (Dr) Anil K. Dixit, Law College Dehradun, Faculty of Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
ABSTRACT
The efficacy and legitimacy of narco-analysis, fingerprinting, and ballistic evidence as they relate to criminal cases are critically examined in this paper. Examined are the validity, moral consequences, and judicial admissibility of narco-analysis, a contentious investigative method that uses truth serum medication to elicit information from suspects. A well-known forensic technique, fingerprinting is evaluated in light of technical developments that have an impact on its efficacy, accuracy, and potential for error. Furthermore, the validity of ballistic evidence involving trajectory reconstruction and firearm analysis in identifying criminals and assessing guilt is assessed.
This paper emphasizes the difficulties involved with these forensic techniques based on case studies, scientific research, and legal precedents. It looks at the laws that control their usage, covering matters of due process, privacy, and constitutional rights. It also examines the difficulties in understanding and presenting such evidence in court, taking into account issues like bias potential, chain of custody, and expert testimony.
This paper intent to give a fair assessment of the efficacy and validity of ballistic evidence, fingerprinting, and narco-analysis in criminal trials by conducting a thorough investigation of the academic literature and empirical research. This emphasizes how crucial it is to guarantee that forensic procedure follow ethical guidelines, are grounded in scientific rigor, and uphold the values of justice and equity within the judicial system. In the conclusion, this research paper aims to contribute to attempts to enhance the integrity and credibility of the criminal justice system and to the ongoing discussion around the usage of forensic evidence in the adjudication of criminal cases.
Keywords: reliability, accuracy, admissibility, ballistic evidence, fingerprinting, forensic methodology
Comments