top of page

Evolution And Comparison Of Competition Laws: US, UK & India




Akshat Mittal, OP Jindal Global University


INTRODUCTION


The idea of Monopoly in a freely competitive market breeds the idea of Anti-Competition legislations. Monopoly, to state, refers to the establishment of control over a product or service by an enterprise through a variety of modes. The biggest bane with which Monopoly comes, is the killing of positive spirit of competition in the market through imposing high prices of goods leading to a collusion against the public in form of imposing higher costs. The cycle continues by the National Demand being hit, thus causing economic distress to the Nation.


But why do firms create these collaborations in the market at the first place? The sole objective of preventing customers from stepping in as sellers is to maximize profits along with stifling creativity and efficiency that a competition fosters.


Free and fair competition, on the other hand provides consumers with a very wide set of alternatives and enhances product differentiation and better satisfaction of consumer demand. Thus, competition in the present era has been a potent tool for encouraging economic development and socioeconomic welfare rather than curbing monopolies only.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page