From Headlines To Judgments: The Effect Of Media On Court Decisions

FULL TEXT LINK

Adithyan. S R, Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala

ABSTRACT

The intersection of media representation and judicial processes in contemporary society presents significant challenges, particularly in high- profile cases that attract extensive media coverage. This phenomenon, often termed a media trial, raises critical questions about the integrity of legal outcomes when influenced by external pressures. The media's role in shaping narratives surrounding criminal cases can overshadow principles of justice and due process, creating environments where public opinion sways judicial proceedings.

This paper examines the relationship between media coverage and judicial processes, emphasizing how sensationalism can bias public perception and juror deliberations. Through case studies, the analysis highlights the implications of media influence on judicial integrity, revealing how external pressures may compromise the fairness of trials. The findings underscore the need for a balanced approach to media reporting that protects judicial independence while maintaining transparency. Ultimately, the study calls for critical reflection on the ethics of media conduct and the necessity for regulations that safeguard the integrity of the justice system in an age dominated by rapid information dissemination

Keywords: Media Representation, Judicial Processes, Media Trials, Public Perception, Presumption of Innocence, Sensationalism, Pretrial Publicity, Due Process, Judicial Independence Fair Trial, Aarushi Talwar Case, Nirbhaya Case, Unnao Rape Case, Trial by Media, Ethical Reporting, Legal Framework, Influence of Media on Judiciary, Public Opinion and Juror Bias

FROM HEADLINES TO JUDGMENTS- THE EFFECT OF MEDIA ON COURT DECISIONS.pdf

Download PDF • 226KB