top of page

How AI-Driven Norms Render The Separation Thesis Of Legal Positivism Obsolete




Md Ferdows Hossen, Advocate of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and a Legal Researcher, Dhaka, Bangladesh.


ABSTRACT:


The separation thesis—law should be morality-independent—is the most fundamental element of legal positivism, which dismisses the natural law theory because it entails morality as an intrinsic part of law. However, evolving technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning models has entrenched itself in the legal domain and represented a paradigm shift in the way we think about law and order. To mitigate the AI-posed risks, policymakers and industry participants ubiquitously agreed to design machines aligned with moral values, which can produce context-specific morality-intense norms (micro- directives) for the regulated actors. I will investigate throughout this paper how the role morality-based AI-driven norms played in leading to a new form of law—micro-directives—and which, in effect, has rendered the separation thesis of legal positivism obsolete.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page