top of page

India And The New York Convention: A Long Way Travelled, A Longer Way To Go




Esha Potdar, National University of Singapore


ABSTRACT


India, a signatory to the New York Convention (NYC) since 1960, governs international arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Judicial interpretations have shaped its application—Bhatia International initially extended Part I to foreign arbitrations, but BALCO adopted a seat-centric approach, restricting enforcement to Part II. Courts have also clarified the scope of “commercial” disputes and narrowed “public policy” as a ground for refusing enforcement, aligning Indian law with global standards. Recent reforms, including the Permanent Court of Arbitration’s office in Delhi and pro-arbitration rulings like Cox & Kings, mark India’s shift toward minimal judicial intervention and reinforce its position as an emerging arbitration hub in the global south. This article will focus solely on the arbitration aspect in India under The Act.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page