Is The Golden Triangle Still “Golden”?
- IJLLR Journal
- 1 day ago
- 1 min read
Medhavi Verma, B.A.LL.B. (Hons.), Jindal Global Law School
ABSTRACT
The Golden Triangle of the Indian Constitution comprises Articles 14, 19, and 21. These provisions have acquired special significance because of their deep commitment to freedom, equality, and democratic values. When read together, these provisions ensure rigorous constitutional scrutiny of state action and function as a shield against unjust and unreasonable laws. Over time, the scope and meaning of these rights have evolved continuously. A significant turning point was the landmark judgment in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, which transformed and refined the interpretation of Articles 14, 19, and 21, and marked an important shift in Indian constitutional jurisprudence. Since then, a range of factors have acted as catalysts in shaping how these rights are understood. These include developments in artificial intelligence, emerging national security concerns, and turbulent economic policies. Correspondingly, the judicial approach to these provisions has moved towards a more purposive interpretation of the constitutional mandate, emphasizing the underlying spirit of the rights rather than a narrow or literal reading of the text. While the legislative intent underlying the Golden Triangle largely remains intact, the way in which these rights manifest in contemporary times has changed. The primary question this paper seeks to answer is whether the Golden Triangle continues to remain truly “golden” in its ability to safeguard individual rights and liberties or has its force diluted in practice. Through critical analysis, examination of constitutional case laws, and inter-jurisdictional comparisons, the paper aims to trace the original intent behind the Golden Triangle, analyze its evolution over time, and assess whether its constitutional promise has been realized in practice.
