top of page

Judgment Analysis - ‘Oreo’ V. ‘Fab!O’




Satyajit Pawar, DES- Shri Navalmal Firodia Law College, Pune

(NEUTRAL CITATION – 2023/DHC/000953)

ABSTRACT

Trademark infringements are not new to the business world. The recent judgment passed by the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in on Interim Application in a commercial suit has vastly relied upon various principles governing the area. The judgment is a perfect example of how a layman is confused by multinationals. The judgment goes on to the length of comparing the disputed brand to that of plaintiff. The court seems to endeavour both sides of a coin by various means as to how and what is necessary to decide disputes of this nature. The Court seems to appreciate the difference between the principles laid down and the necessity of their applicability. Though the Court made it clear that the said Interim Order may not affect the final outcome of the suit, it is clear at the outset as to how the suit will be decided as the comparative analysis is quiet clear to that end.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page