top of page

Responsive Lawmaking In Singapore And Lessons For Vietnam




Tran Dao Viet Hung, Hanoi Law University

Pham Phuong Linh, Hanoi Law University

Tran Thi Van Ha, Hanoi Law University


ABSTRACT


In response to the pressing need for legal reform amid digital transformation, globalization, and the emergence of new business models, responsive lawmaking is increasingly recognized as a crucial approach to enhancing the adaptability and effectiveness of state governance. This paper examines Singapore’s model of responsive lawmaking, a country renowned for integrating innovation with effective public policy. By analyzing mechanisms such as regulatory sandboxes, cross-sectoral policy dialogues, and timely feedback processes, the study highlights how Singapore strikes a balance between legal flexibility and the rule of law. From this analysis, the paper draws out practical lessons that can inform Vietnam’s legal reform efforts, particularly in sectors such as the digital economy, financial technology, and innovation policy. Advancing a culture of responsive lawmaking will enable Vietnam to proactively manage regulatory risks while laying the groundwork for sustainable development and deeper global integration.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page