Sedition - A Regressive Approach To Dissent And The Need To Decriminalize It





Vidhya Sankar, Adoniya Gigi and Sarah Joseph, Bharata Mata School of Legal Studies


ABSTRACT


Martin Luther King who was the crusader of the U.S. civil rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s once said “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter”.1 which implies that the silence of the oppressed gives more power to the oppressor. It’s the 21st century, we have been an independent country for 74 years now but even today we carry the vestige of the abusive colonial masters - The Sedition Law. The legitimate free speech in India is a myth. Why do we a Sedition law when we have Prevention of Terrorism Act and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in order to curb terrorism? Sedition law and its variants are currently wreaking havoc on Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Before the untimely demise of our democracy due to the failure of Judiciary, Legislature and Executive, we need to discover an antidote that not only curbs the particular variant but also obviates the spread of any other variants in future. Our research paper aims to delineate on why we need to decriminalize the sedition laws in India.


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.