top of page

Stray Dogs And Public Safety: The Supreme Court’s Legal Responses In India




Ram Narayan Garg, LL.M., Lovely Professional University, Phagwara


ABSTRACT


The conflict between protecting animals and keeping people safe in India is most clearly seen in the case of stray dogs. Every year, there are lakhs of dog bites and hundreds of deaths from rabies. At the same time, the law recognizes animal’s constitutional and statutory rights. This research paper looks at how the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts have made laws about stray dogs, balancing the needs of public safety, animal welfare, and civic governance. The analysis advances through a doctrinal and empirical framework, systematically tracing statutory provisions, judicial pronouncements, and policy measures in chronological order. The conversation also talks about the views of stakeholders, the problems that come up during implementation, and recent court cases, such as the suo motu Supreme Court hearings of August 2025. Ultimately, the paper contends that a rights-based equilibrium, founded on humane contraception, rigorous rabies control, and collaborative federalism, is essential for reconciling constitutional protections for both humans and animals.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page