top of page

Struggles In Death Penalty Sentencing: Guidelines In Manoj Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh (2022) And Their Non-Compliance

ree



Alind Gupta, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES)


ABSTRACT


In recent years, India’s death penalty administration has been criticized by various stakeholders. One of the common threads running through all the critiques is the arbitrary sentencing process in capital punishment cases. In order to ensure some consistency in consideration of relevant factors during the sentencing stage, the Supreme Court in Manoj vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) laid down certain practical guidelines. The guidelines seek to ensure the collection of mitigating circumstances during the trial stage itself by casting a duty on the trial court to extract information pertaining to accused from the state. Despite the importance and unequivocal nature of these directions, the Trial Courts have failed to comply with them.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page