top of page

The Abrogation Of Article 370: Reassessing India’s Model Of Asymmetrical Federalism




Riddhi Gupta, LLM, Amity Law School, Amity University, Noida


ABSTRACT


Article 370, which was crafted as a constitutional device in order to address the unique accession of Jammu and Kashmir to the Indian Union in 1947, embodied a distinctive kind of asymmetry within India’s federal structure. Though it was labelled as a “temporary provision”, it evolved into a symbol of autonomy and a means for managing diversity. The constitutional arrangement took a decisive turn in August 2019, when Article 370 was effectively abrogated through a Presidential Order, followed by the enactment of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. This paper seeks to explore the historical origins of Article 370, examine its constitutional foundation and judicial interpretations, and analyse the political as well as federal implications that emerged from its repeal. It also situates India’s experience into broader comparative frameworks of asymmetrical federalism structure being followed in countries like Canada, the UK, and the USA. It concludes by revisiting whether India’s shift from accommodation to uniformity strengthens or undermines its constitutional project of unity in diversity.


Keywords: Article 370, Jammu & Kashmir, asymmetrical federalism, constitutional law, Indian federalism, abrogation.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page