top of page

The Gap Between Codified Law And Social Practice: A Critical Analysis And Reform Of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955




Abhishek Mahapatra, Birla School of Law, Bhubaneswar


1. ABSTRACT


The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, stands as a cornerstone of social reform in post- independence India, codifying principles that aimed to transform the traditional; Hindu conception of marriage from a sacrament into legal binding and legal contract. Yet, despite its progressive intent, the act continues to face challenges in implementation, as deeply entrenched customs and social norms often prevail over statutory laws. This article examines the exact cause or gap between the statutory laws and social practices in context of Hindu marriages. It critically analyses how often the social attitudes , beliefs, gender hierarchy, and customary practices such as child marriages affect the effectiveness if the statutory law or Hindu Marriage Act ,1955. Using landmark judgements and judicial decisions, the article explore the tension between reformist legal ideas influenced by different cultural identities and resistant cultural realities. It concludes by proposing reform ideas to bridge this gap, ensuring that the laws transformative intent is realised within lived social experience.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page