The Language Of Cross-Examination: A Psychological & Literary Study
- IJLLR Journal
- Oct 3
- 1 min read
Amrutha J Kudur, BBA LLB (Hons.), PES University
ABSTRACT
Cross-examination being a mighty tool of advocacy, serves both as instrument of persuasion and as quest for the truth. This paper views the technique of cross examination as a legal strategy and a literary device while using psychological theories and textual analysis. This study delves into the functions of cross examination as a tool of persuasion, performance, and psychological influence by analysing fictional works such as To Kill a Mockingbird (HARPER LEE,1960) and A Few Good Men (AARON SORKIN,1989). We examine psychological processes like memory suggestibility, cognitive dissonance, and confirmation bias as well as rhetorical devices like leading questions Manson, repetition, and framing by contrasting these works with the actual O.J. Simpson and Charles trials. By blending legal, psychological, and literary perspectives, this paper argues that cross-examination is more than just a part of a trial, but also an anecdote that builds meaning, unveils bias and dramatizes truth-seeking.
Keywords: Psychology of law, cross-examination, language of law, Psychology of cross-examination
