The Paradox Of Collective Security: International Law In Flux With Reference To The Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Preti Majumer, School of Law, Christ (Deemed to be) University, Bangalore

ABSTRACT:

The writers of this article investigate the notion of collective security as a foundation for international law's validity and implementation in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Collective security proposes that states may achieve and maintain peace by handling security concerns collectively rather than individually. Despite its theoretical attractiveness, the practical implementation of collective security has faced major problems, such as enforcement concerns and competing national interests. The Russia-Ukraine crisis is a tragic case study, demonstrating the limitations of collective security in the face of powerful states pursuing their own interests.

The international community's response to the crisis has been marked by diplomatic tensions, economic sanctions, and limited direct military participation due to concerns about escalation. Russia's use of its veto power in the UN Security Council hampered efforts to resolve the problem collectively. However, the violence has prompted efforts to hold aggressors responsible through judicial proceedings and regional mediation. While collective security has limits, such as the need for more state collaboration and conformity to international law, it remains an important instrument for conflict prevention and global peacekeeping. Efforts to promote collective security should prioritise collaboration, increased respect to international law, and tackling the core causes of conflict.

Keywords: Collective security, international law, Russia-Ukraine, Enforcement issues, Conflict resolution