top of page

Understanding The Concept Of Liberty: Jurisprudential Perspectives And Its Socio- Political Relevance




Yogesh Pal, Research Scholar, Amity University, Haryana, India


ABSTRACT


Liberty, while often conflated with freedom, holds a more nuanced and legally grounded significance within societal structures. This paper explores the conceptual foundations of liberty, tracing its philosophical and legal interpretations through the lenses of eminent thinkers such as Hohfeld, Isaiah Berlin, John Stuart Mill, and Christopher Caudwell. It distinguishes liberty from absolute freedom, emphasizing that liberty is constrained by legal and ethical boundaries established to protect the rights of others. Berlin's dichotomy of positive and negative liberty reveals the tension between personal autonomy and social regulation, while Mill advocates for individual liberty as a safeguard against both governmental tyranny and the overreach of societal norms. Caudwell, through a Marxist framework, critiques capitalist structures that mask inequality under the illusion of liberty, asserting that true liberty lies in the capacity and resources to act freely. The study also connects these theoretical views with the constitutional guarantees of liberty in India, particularly Articles 19, 32, and 226, highlighting the judiciary's role in upholding these rights. Ultimately, the paper underscores liberty not just as a philosophical ideal but as a foundational element of a just and progressive society.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page