Use Of Case Study In Doctrinal Legal Research: Methodological Challenges
- IJLLR Journal
- Apr 17
- 1 min read
Updated: Apr 27
Tharun R, LL.M. (Criminal Law), CMR University School of Legal Studies, Bengaluru, Karnataka
ABSTRACT
This term paper examines the role of case studies in doctrinal legal research, with particular attention to their applications, benefits, and the methodological challenges they bring to this traditional approach. Doctrinal legal research centers on analyzing legal principles, statutes, and judicial decisions to develop a detailed understanding of the law. While primarily theoretical, doctrinal research can gain practical depth when supplemented with case studies, as these provide concrete insights into judicial reasoning and the real-world application of legal doctrines. Through examining specific cases, researchers can develop a deeper understanding of how legal principles are interpreted across different scenarios, adding dimension to doctrinal findings.
However, incorporating case studies within doctrinal research also presents unique challenges. These include maintaining objectivity, as personal interpretation may introduce biases, and managing limitations in accessing comprehensive case data, which can restrict the depth of analysis. Furthermore, case-specific details may not always generalize well, raising concerns about the representativeness of findings.
This paper identifies these methodological hurdles and proposes solutions to address them. By assessing the advantages and limitations of using case studies in doctrinal research, the paper aims to highlight their value and explore how they can enhance the depth and practical relevance of legal scholars.
Keywords: Doctrinal legal research, Case studies, Methodological challenges, Judicial precedent, Legal interpretation
