top of page

Abuse Of Dominance - The Google Meet Case




Srinjoy Mitra, LLB, Symbiosis Law School, Pune (Symbiosis International University)


ABSTRACT


This studyexplores the “Google Meet” case, investigating claims of Google's anticompetitive actions and their effects on the technology industry. It examines the potential abuse of power that Google's conduct may have on rivals and customers in accordance with “Section 4 of the Competition Act of 2002”. The article also covers a recent decision made by the Competition Commission of India (“CCI”) on January 29, 2021, in “Baglekar Akash Kumar v. Google LLC.The panel of three judges of the CCI determined that the combination of the video conferencing app “Google Meet” and Google Mail (G-Mail) does not constitute an abuse of a dominant position. It also examines how this case complies with US and EU competition rules, emphasising the case-by-case methodology Indian courts have used to resolve similar problems and look for viable remedies.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page