Smita S. Angadi, Research Scholar at Karnataka State Law University’s Law School, Research Centre, Hubballi & Asst. Professor of Law in DBHPS Law College, Koppal.
ABSTRACT
Heritage Sites are a symbol of history. They are representation of the past and several times it becomes hard to understand why exactly do we need to spend time, energy and money to preserve heritage sites. Are they really important in the current world we live in? Apparently, they are. History serves as a laboratory and the past serves as a demarcation to understand the regional laws and social structures. This understanding helps in our progress towards an ideal society. However, learning about various cultures helps us to be a good global citizen and improve our critical and analytical thinking.1
Preservation of Heritage is an inevitable responsibility of state as well as of the Citizens. To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture is the Fundamental duty imposed on citizens under Art. 51 A (f) of Indian Constitution. Article 49 of Directive Principles of State Policy deals with protection of Monuments, Places and Objects of National importance, from spoliation, disfigurement, destruction, removal, disposal or export, as the case may be. It is an obligation of state to protect them by declaring or under law made by Parliament under Entry 67 of List I in VII schedule. Accordingly, Parliament has enacted many such laws for the protection of cultural heritage and ancient monuments. This paper deals with the analysis of The Indian Treasure Trove Act, 1878 and The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Amendment And Validation) Act, 2010.
Keywords: Cultural Heritage, Constitutional Provisions, Treasure Trove, Ancient Monuments, Archaeological Sites and Remains
