top of page

Appellate Arbitration In India: Comparing With Global Perspectives




Abhishek R Shenoy, BBA LLB, School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University)


ABSTRACT


Arbitration is characterised by party autonomy, confidentiality, and the finality of awards, with judicial review remaining broadly restricted. Yet in India, judicial intervention and the growing complexity of disputes have revealed deficiencies in error-correction and weakened the legitimacy of the arbitral process. This paper examines India’s Draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, which for the first time proposes the creation of Appellate Arbitral Tribunals (AATs) under Section 34A, thereby institutionalising a statutory two-tier arbitral framework.


The novelty of this development lies in shifting the corrective function from courts to specialised arbitral forums, a move distinct from both the judicial avenue to set aside under Section 34 and the contractual two-tier mechanisms upheld in Centrotrade v. Hindustan Copper Ltd.. Contemporary literature has explored contractual models of arbitral appeals, with little scholarship on statutory arbitral appellate mechanisms, leaving an important gap in understanding how legislated error-correction may reshape arbitral practice. This is due to the speculative nature of only a proposed amendment. This paper addresses that gap by analysing Section 34A as a doctrinal shift that codifies appellate arbitration as a systemic feature, confined to grounds such as fraud, bias, excess of jurisdiction, and public policy.


Through comparative insights from the U.S., U.K., and Singapore, the paper situates India’s reform within global debates on the tension between finality and correctness. It argues that AATs represent a novel institutional experiment, with the potential to enhance coherence and predictability while risking replication of litigation’s inefficiencies if not procedurally disciplined.


Keywords: Arbitration, Appellate Arbitral Tribunals, Section 34A, Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Draft Arbitration Bill 2024, judicial review



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page