top of page

Artificial Intelligence And Legal Philosophy: Navigating New Frontiers




Shilpi Rani, National University of Study & Research in Law


ABSTRACT


The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the legal domain presents profound philosophical and practical challenges, reshaping traditional concepts of agency, responsibility, personhood, and justice. AI's ability to automate legal tasks, predict outcomes, and assist in judicial decision- making introduces efficiencies but also raises ethical concerns about accountability, transparency, and bias. This article explores the philosophical foundations of AI in law, examining its applications, the redefinition of legal personhood and agency, theories of responsibility, and the ethics of surveillance and big data. It also addresses algorithmic fairness, the "black box" problem, and the implications of technological determinism for legal norms. By analyzing these dimensions, the article underscores the need for adaptive legal frameworks that balance technological innovation with ethical integrity to ensure a just society.


Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Legal Philosophy, Accountability, Legal Personhood, Agency, Algorithmic Bias, Surveillance, Ethics, Transparency, Justice



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

​

Abbreviation: IJLLR

​

ISSN: 2582-8878

​

Website: www.ijllr.com

​

Accessibility: Open Access

​

License: Creative Commons 4.0

​

Submit Manuscript: Click here

​

Licensing: ​

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

​

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page