Jagrthy K V, BBA LLB, Alliance University
FACTS
Plaintiff alleges that Rakman Prasad, his sons and descendants formed a common Hindu family, that there was no division in the family and that three members of that family namely Kasi Ram, Ragbar Dayal and Bhagwan Dayal was that he opened the store normally. In Agra they jointly acquired some properties and houses during the lifetime of Kasi Ram, some after his death, the rest after Ragbar Dayal's death, and according to Hindu law , these properties were the members' common family property.His other case was that after the death of Kashi Ram, business and goods acquired during his lifetime were passed through the survivors to the plaintiff and Raghubar Dayal, and after Raghubar Dayal's death , that Dayal acquired the property along with Raghubar's previous life. They were handed over to plaintiffs only. The property listed in Appendix A was the property of an ancestor. Those listed in Appendix B were property acquired jointly by the three members during Kashi Ram's lifetime. The assets listed in Appendix C are those acquired by Raghubar Dayal and the plaintiffs after the death of Kashi Ram. D-Schedule's assets were acquired by the plaintiff after the death of Raghubar Dayal.
