top of page

Case Analysis: L Chandrakumar Vs. Union Of India (AIR 1997 SC 1125)




Anugu Manogna Reddy, Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad

A Lavaneetha, Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad


ABSTRACT


This paper presents a critical evaluation of the case, L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India1 (1997), particularly the constitutionality of the Administrative Tribunals under articles 323A & 323B. This supports the Supreme Court’s decision that while judicial review is woven into the very fabric of the Constitution, it means constant scrutiny of the tribunals’ decisions by the High Courts. The discussion is taken further to include the effect in the Administrative Tribunals Act 1985 and provides a look at some appropriate cases. In addition, the requirements for changes to improve the work of tribunals while preserving the constitution are discussed.


Keywords: Administrative Tribunals, Judicial Review, Doctrine of Basic Structure, Precedent 





Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page