top of page

Case Analysis: Sukhdev Singh And Ors. Vs. Bhagat Ram And Ors. 1975




Mansi Agrawal, School of Law, Bennett University

This is a case comment dealing with jurisprudence over removal of an employee working under an institution which is governed by a legislative statute. The court delas with questions of law under Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India.

FACTS

An employee, Bhagat Ram Singh Raghuvanshi had been removed from his services by a corporation which followed the regulations given under Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959; the Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948; and the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956. Bhagat Ram filed a civil appeal under High court2 to ask for a relief and possibly get his service back. The High court declared that removing of Bhagat Ram Singh from service was null and void and that he be given his job back. The High court granted a writ of mandamus as it was declared that the corporation acted as a state function and hence is a state3.

In 19724, the High court in appeal no. 1879 declared that the rules and regulations which were laid down by the corporation had no force of law and that the corporation should not be permitted to enforce the regulations mentioned in Clauses (1) & (4) of Regulation 25.

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page