Case Comment On Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Vs. G. Chinnandurai
- IJLLR Journal
- Nov 3
- 1 min read
Manju Bhashini G, LL.M. Student, Department of Law, Chennai Dr. Ambedhkar Government Law College, Pudupakkam, Chennai - 603103 Affiliated with Tamilnadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India
ABSTRACT
Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. v. G. Chinnandurai case remark critically analyses the court's reaction to the tension between environmental justice and economic growth. The Madras High Court's ruling, which holds Neyveli Lignite Corporation responsible for ecological damage brought on by its fly ash disposal methods, exemplifies the implementation of the “Polluter Pays” principle. In addition to providing sufficient compensation for impacted residents, the ruling is noteworthy for its harsh criticism of public sector initiatives that prolong small disputes and so add to the backlog of cases in court. Crucially, the decision highlights weaknesses in systematic enforcement and the difficulties of converting court decisions into practical remedies, even as it upholds progressive environmental doctrine and constitutional guarantees. All things considered, the case establishes a progressive standard for PSU accountability and effective justice delivery, reaffirming the notion that the rights and welfare of marginalised populations cannot be compromised by economic advancement. This comment contains the elements like Case Identification, Introduction, Background, Procedural History, Facts of the Case, Issues , Legal Provisions Involved, Held - Arguments of Parties, Precedent Cases, Judgment, Court’s Reasoning, Case Comment, Conclusion, References
