top of page

Challenges And Prospects Of The Witness Protection: A Comparative Study




Shashwat Chandra, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya, Bihar

Dr. Deo Narayan Singh, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya, Bihar


ABSTRACT


The Article centers on a comprehensive comparison of the Witness Protection Programs (WPPs) in five different jurisdictions: India, United States, United Kingdom, South Africa, and Australia in terms of legal frameworks, administrative structures, and operational methods. Different approaches are revealed by the study, such as the strong, identity-changing model of the U.S. Witness Security Program (WITSEC) and the Australian National Witness Protection Program (NWPP). Furthermore, it scrutinizes the more procedural systems in the UK and South Africa. The study wraps up with recommendations for India. Among these are setting up a National Witness Protection Act to establish a dedicated and empowered agency, tapping technology with video conferencing and secure witness portals, providing extensive witness assistance programs, and enacting judicial reforms to lessen delays. India would, therefore, not only deal with its own problem but also come closer to the global goal of the justice system where fear is not a barrier to the truth.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page