top of page

Child Compulsory Education In India




Shubham Kumar & Bhavya Sahu, Lovely professional university


ABSTRACT


This paper examines the legal, historical, and practical contours of compulsory education in India. Beginning with constitutional provisions and landmark judicial pronouncements that recognized education as integral to human dignity, the study traces the evolution culminating in the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment), the insertion of Article 21A, and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE). It analyses the statutory framework, identifies operational and systemic challenges (access, quality, infrastructure, teacher shortages, exclusion and private- public tensions), and studies landmark case law shaping implementation and limits of the RTE (including Mohini Jain, Unnikrishnan, Society for Unaided Private Schools, and Pramati). A comparative snapshot with selected international models (Finland and the United States) highlights divergent policy choices. The paper concludes with critical recommendations to make compulsory education in India more equitable, inclusive, and effective. Primary sources (statute and judgments) and authoritative policy reports inform the analysis.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page