Child Protection Vs. Digital Freedom: A Legal Analysis Of Social Media Bans For Minors
- IJLLR Journal
- 3 days ago
- 1 min read
Tannistha, National Law Institute University, Bhopal
Swabhiman Swarup, National Law University, Odisha
ABSTRACT
Social media is an indispensable part of modern life, particularly for minors, who utilize these platforms for self-expression, education, and social interaction.1 However, the risks posed by unregulated access—including cyberbullying, data exploitation, online grooming, and exposure to harmful content—have led governments to explore regulatory measures such as social media bans for minors. This paper critically examines the legal and ethical implications of such measures, focusing on global case studies from Australia, the United States, and India. It evaluates whether social media bans align with constitutional rights, international child protection standards, and principles of proportionality. The analysis highlights that while these measures are often well-intentioned, they may disproportionately infringe on minors’ digital freedoms, such as freedom of expression and privacy. The paper proposes alternatives, including enhanced digital literacy programs, robust regulatory oversight, and collaborative approaches that balance child protection with minors’ autonomy. By addressing the complexities of this debate, the research underscores the need for nuanced and inclusive policy frameworks that prioritize the best interests of children without unduly restricting their rights.
