Comparative Analysis Of Merger Control In India, US And Europe
- IJLLR Journal
- 57 minutes ago
- 1 min read
Ms. Aditya Vidyarthi, NALSAR University of Law
ABSTRACT
Merger Control is a central pillar of competition law, aimed at regulating mergers and acquisitions to prevent anti-competitive outcomes such as monopolization, reduced consumer choice, market distortions. While the core objective outcomes such as monopolization, reduced consumer choice, and market distortions. While the core objective of preserving competition is common across jurisdictions, merger control frameworks differ in their legal structures, institutional design, and enforcement approaches, reflecting varied economic and policy considerations.
This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of merger control regimes in India, the United States, and the European Union, focusing on the roles of the Competition Commission of India, the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, and the European Commission under the EU Merger Regulation. It examines key determinants of effective merger regulation, including jurisdictional thresholds, notification requirements, review timelines, and the economic tools employed in merger assessments.
This paper further evaluates enforcement practices and regulatory effectiveness across these jurisdictions to identify strengths, shortcomings, and areas for reform. By highlighting comparative insights and best practices, the study aims to contribute to a better understanding of how merger control frameworks can balance competition protection with economic growth in an increasingly globalized market environment.
