top of page

Constitutionalizing Personal Law: A Critical Analysis Of The Triple Talaq Controversy, Gender Justice, And Executive Legislation In India

Aug 25
1 min read



Raghavendra Singh, Practicing Advocate, Allahabad High Court


ABSTRACT


This paper analyzes the complex constitutional interface between religious personal laws and fundamental civil rights in India. By critically examining the practice of Talaq-e-Biddat (instant triple talaq), the study explores the boundaries of judicial review under Article 32, the constitutional susceptibility of personal laws under Article 13, and the limits of executive power under the Ordinance-making provisions of Article 123. Furthermore, the paper incorporates critical and active legal developments up to 2026, focusing on the constitutional challenges against the criminalization of divorce under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. It argues that while the eradication of discriminatory marital practices is a vital milestone for gender justice, the mechanisms of reform must respect the separation of powers, avoid disproportionate criminalization, and align with the principles of transformative constitutionalism and constitutional morality.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page