top of page

Digital Privacy Vs National Security: A Constitutional Analysis




Deona Lita Dsouza, SDM Law College, Mangalore


ABSTRACT


The rapid digitalization of governance and society in India has significantly changed the relationship between individual rights and State power. The rise of surveillance technologies, claimed to be for national security, has increased worries about privacy, autonomy, and dignity. This article draws on Indian legal scholarship and constitutional law to explore the growing tension between digital privacy and national security. It examines how the view of privacy as a fundamental right has shifted, especially after the case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India. It also assesses whether India's legal framework for surveillance and data protection is adequate. The article argues that while national security is a valid constitutional goal, the lack of strong safeguards and oversight may weaken democratic values and the rule of law. It concludes by promoting a proportionality-based constitutional approach that balances privacy and security.


Keywords: Digital Privacy, National Security, Surveillance, Constitutional Law, India, Data Protection, Fundamental Rights, Cyber Law.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page