top of page

Efficacy Of The Witness Protection Scheme 2018: Challenges, Judicial Responses, And The Road Ahead




Dhiraj Kumar Mishra, University Department of Law, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India.

Anamika Kumari, University Department of Law, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India.


ABSTRACT


Witness protection is a critical component of any criminal justice system that aspires to uphold fairness, transparency, and the rule of law. In India, the absence of a statutory witness protection framework has historically resulted in intimidation, coercion, and the alarming rise of hostile witnesses. The Witness Protection Scheme, 2018—approved by the Supreme Court— represents India’s first national-level attempt to institutionalize witness protection. This paper evaluates the efficacy of the Scheme by examining judicial responses, administrative challenges, and comparative international models. Through doctrinal and analytical research, the study identifies structural gaps, implementation barriers, and the need for statutory reinforcement. The paper concludes with recommendations for strengthening India’s witness protection regime to ensure meaningful participation of witnesses and enhance the credibility of the criminal justice system.


Keywords: Witness Protection Scheme 2018, Hostile Witnesses, Judicial Response, Criminal Justice Reform, Witness Security, India.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page