top of page

Electoral Design And Federal Representation: Why Equal State Seats Are Incompatible With The Current Rajya Sabha Framework




Suhail Farooq Khan, Assistant Professor Law, KCEF Law College, Pulwama, J&K


ABSTRACT


The impending census and delimitation exercise has renewed constitutional debate on representation and federal balance in India. While population- based reallocation of seats in the House of the People advances democratic equality, it risks disproportionately disadvantageous to the states that have experienced slower population growth and risk loss of seats based on population. This paper examines whether the Council of States can function as an institutional counterweight to such demographic redistribution.


Through an analysis of its composition, indirect electoral mechanisms, and voting thresholds, the paper argues that India’s rejection of equal State representation in the upper chamber reflects a deliberate constitutional choice balancing demographic proportionality with federal accommodation. Doctrinal analysis and failings of the Tenth Schedule in curbing cross-voting further demonstrate that any proposal for equal representation for States in Council of States would introduce significant operational distortions without resolving enforcement weaknesses.


Keywords: Bicameral system, Council of States, Delimitation, Federalism, Voter-threshold, Constitutional design, Anti-Defection.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page