Ensuring Accountability In Custodial Practices: A Judicial Analysis Of Paramvir Singh Saini V. Baljit Singh
- IJLLR Journal
- May 26
- 1 min read
Darshi Sharma Guhey, PhD Scholar, Faculty of Law, Symbiosis International University, Pune
Dr. Deepti Khubalkar, Assistant Professor, Symbiosis Law School, Nagpur
Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh, SLP (Crl.) No. 2302 of 2017
ABSTRACT
Ensuring the safeguarding of human rights within the confines of police stations remains a pivotal concern. The escalation in instances of custodial torture underscores the imperative for instilling awareness through early- stage human rights education and training. Addressing this issue, the esteemed Supreme Court, in the case of Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh, has made it obligatory to install Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras in police stations and premises of investigative agencies. This mandate is aimed at upholding constitutional provisions pertaining to the rights of individuals and undertrial prisoners, as enshrined in Article 21. By mandating CCTV installations, the judiciary seeks to promote transparency and accountability within law enforcement agencies, thereby curbing instances of human rights violations. These measures serve as a proactive step towards fostering a system where the fundamental rights of every individual are respected and protected. Moreover, such initiatives not only act as a deterrent against potential abuses of power but also contribute to building trust between law enforcement authorities and the public they serve. In essence, the integration of CCTV surveillance aligns with the overarching goal of ensuring justice and upholding human dignity within the realm of law enforcement. This analysis explores the judicial mandate for CCTV installation in police stations as a pivotal measure to uphold human rights and ensure accountability within the criminal justice system
Keywords: Accountability, CCTV, Human Rights, Transparency, Undertrial Prisoners
