Ethical Conundrums And Legal Professionals
- IJLLR Journal
- 4 hours ago
- 1 min read
Sukhmani Sethi, Graduate, School of Law, UPES Dehradun
ABSTRACT
The moral compass and empathy of lawyers significantly shape their professional conduct and decision-making, often within a subjective framework of right and wrong influenced by societal norms. Situations exist wherein Lawyers must avoid questions where their ability to act in the best interest of a client may be compromised.
The adversarial system's dependence on subjective interpretations of statutes and precedents underscores the interplay between personal narratives, societal values, and legal reasoning. This fluidity is compounded by the evolving nature of law, shaped by technological advances, cultural shifts, and political changes. The notion of objective truth becomes increasingly pertinent as legal perspectives diverge and adapt to modern complexities.
Additionally, the relevance of doctrines like holder-in-due-course (HDC) further raises the decline of traditional legal principles in a digital age. As electronic transactions and contemporary financial instruments outpace the protections these doctrines once provided, the legal profession must reconcile historical frameworks with emerging realities. This shift reflects broader trends in legal evolution, where adaptability and inclusivity of perspectives foster a nuanced understanding of justice. Ultimately, acknowledging the limitations of subjective viewpoints invites an empathetic, ethical approach to legal practice, addressing the delicate balance between advocacy, morality, and societal responsibility.
