top of page

Evolution And Significance Of Basic Structure Doctrine In India

Aug 26
1 min read



Vipul, Manav Rachna University, Faridabad


ABSTRACT


The “Doctrine of Basic Structure” was devised by the Judicial system 53 years ago, by the landmark judgement Kesavananda Bharti Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala. The lengthy judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court was the desperate attempt of the judiciary to guard the constitutional integrity against the arbitrary amendment by the Legislature.


The paper is an attempt to provide the reader a comprehensive analysis of the various judgements such as Sankari Prasad v. Union of India, Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, Golak Nath v. State of Punjab, Kesavananda Bharti Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala, Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain, Minerva Mills v. Union of India, and followed by Indra Sawhney v. Union of India. The paper provides a brief overview of these judgements and also provides the critical analysis of the “Doctrine of Basic Structure”. The paper is an attempt to help the reader to form a clear opinion about the doctrine of the basic structure. Herein cited in the footnotes, are the relevant official sources and various research papers and judgements of the court that I have used to write this paper.




Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page