Federalism And Ethnic Tensions In Manipur: Examining Governance And Its Influence On Social Harmony
- IJLLR Journal
- Feb 17
- 1 min read
Gulnar Arora, IILM University, Gurugram
ABSTRACT
This paper explores the role of federalism in shaping ethnic tensions in Manipur, a northeastern state of India. Known for its diverse population and complex history, Manipur has faced significant ethnic conflicts, partly due to the challenges in balancing state autonomy and central control within India’s federal system. The study examines how the relationship between the state and the central government has impacted ethnic harmony in the region. It highlights the historical context of Manipur’s ethnic crises, with a focus on the significance of federal governance mechanisms such as ethnic representation, the role of the Inner Line Permit (ILP) system in regulating migration, and the distribution of political power.
The paper also evaluates how the state government and security forces have responded to ethnic conflicts and the effectiveness of existing governance structures. Despite the potential for federalism to offer greater regional autonomy, the failure to address the unique needs of different ethnic groups has often led to feelings of exclusion and marginalization. This lack of political inclusivity has worsened divisions, further fueling tensions among communities.
In conclusion, the paper suggests that for lasting peace and social harmony, a more inclusive and decentralized approach to governance is essential. Strengthening federalism through local autonomy, enhancing political representation for marginalized communities, and developing effective conflict resolution mechanisms are key steps toward addressing ethnic tensions in Manipur. The paper emphasizes that a responsive and inclusive federal framework, coupled with community-based peacebuilding, is critical for fostering unity and reducing divisions in the state.
Comments