top of page

Leveraging ADR For Environmental Dispute Resolution: Insights From Indian Courts




Shrishti Pandey, LL.M, School of Law, Justice & Governance, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, UP.

Dr. Ravi Prakash Rahul, Assistant Professor, School of Law, Justice & Governance, Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, UP.


ABSTRACT


Indian Court’s are swamped and environmental fights from polluted rivers to land conflicts take years to settle. This article looks at how ADR tools like mediation, arbitration and Lok Adalat can offer a faster, less hostile way out. By studying key cases from the Supreme Court and NGT, it shows that Indian judges are slowly warming up to ADR for green disputes because it’s flexible, brings people to the table and can focus on real fixes instead of just punishment. Some environmental issues affect everyone and may not be fit for private settlement. There is also a risk that poor communities may not have equal power against big companies. The article suggests blending court backed mediation with expert panels so we get decisions that are quick, fair and actually help the environment.


Keywords: Environmental disputes, Alternative Dispute Resolution, National Green Tribunal (NGT), Mediation, Indian courts.



Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Licensing: 

 

All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page